Chapter 06 · Topic 06.5 · Investor / Entrepreneur
Verified fact: the bill's official short title in the 119th Congress is the Canadian Snowbird Act (H.R. 3070), the name Canadian Snowbird Visa Act surviving from earlier versions and press coverage. Status on Congress.gov as of June 10, 2026: introduced April 29, 2025, latest action April 29, 2025, referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary and, in addition, to the Committee on Ways and Means; no committee vote, hearing, or floor action since. GovTrack's prognosis the same day: a 2 percent chance of enactment. The bill is pending, not dead: the 119th Congress runs to January 2027, but nothing has moved in over thirteen months. Sources: congress.gov bill page H.R. 3070 (119th) and govtrack.us/congress/bills/119/hr3070, both consulted June 10, 2026.
Canadian Snowbird Visa Act (H.R. 3070): status and impact for Canadians
Bill that would extend Canadian snowbird (50+) stays to 240 days per 365 (vs. 182 today). Filed April 2025, in committee, not voted as of 2026-06-10.
Direct answer · 60-second summary
Bill status, verified June 11, 2026
Checked at congress.gov on June 11, 2026: H.R. 3070, the Canadian Snowbird Act (119th Congress), still shows as its latest action "Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means" dated April 29, 2025. No committee vote, no floor action since: the bill remains exactly where it was, and nothing on this page is a prediction.
The 60-second version
The Canadian Snowbird Visa Act (H.R. 3070) is a bill introduced in the U.S. Congress on April 29, 2025 by Representatives Stefanik (R-NY), Lee (R-FL), and Stanton (D-AZ). It would let Canadians aged 50 and older stay in the United States up to 240 days per 365-day period (vs. the current 182) without a visa, provided they keep a residence in Canada and don't work there. As of June 10, 2026, the bill has not been voted on, it is in committee. GovTrack estimates its odds of enactment at roughly 2%, in line with the 2016, 2017, 2019, 2021, and 2023 versions, all of which died without a vote. Until the law is enacted, the standard B-1/B-2 6-month (182-day) rule remains in effect.
Acronyms used in this guide
INA: Immigration and Nationality Act. Congress.gov: S. 2406 (119th Congress), Canadian Snowbirds Act of 2025, status, consulted June 11, 2026. POE: Port of Entry. CBP: U.S. Customs and Border Protection. I-94: Arrival/Departure record kept by CBP for nonimmigrants. I-539: Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status. SPT: Substantial Presence Test (IRC §7701(b)). IRC: Internal Revenue Code. B-2: Pleasure / tourism visitor. EO: Executive Order.
Origin and history of the bill
The idea of extending Canadian snowbird stays has cycled through Congress for over a decade. Per GovTrack, the "Canadian Snowbird Visa Act" or its variants have been introduced in at least 2016, 2017, 2019, 2021, 2023, and 2025. None has cleared committee.
The driving rationale: the Canadian Snowbird Association estimates roughly 1 million Canadians winter in the U.S. South (Florida, Arizona, Texas, California). These stays are estimated to inject several billion USD into those state economies (housing, restaurants, private healthcare, golf, retail).
Politically, the bill enjoys bipartisan support from snowbird-friendly states: New York (border), Florida, and Arizona (destinations).
Content of the 2025 version (H.R. 3070)
The bill, introduced April 29, 2025, amends INA §214 (8 U.S.C. §1184) to add a Canadian-snowbird-specific visitor category. Main conditions (subject to final text):
Canadian citizen by birth or naturalization. Minimum age 50 at entry. Maintain residence in Canada (principal residence must remain Canadian). Own or lease a residence in the U.S. (purchase, condo, or long-term lease). No paid employment in the U.S. No public benefits (Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, public housing). Maximum stay: 240 days per 365, replacing the 182-day B-1/B-2 ceiling.
The bill does not create a formal visa, it broadens the visitor exemption Canadians already enjoy. Practically, it modifies the admissible status at the POE.
Current legislative status: what actually applies
Important, not yet in effect
As of June 10, 2026, H.R. 3070 is not law. It is in House committee. It would need to: (1) clear committee with favorable recommendation, (2) pass the House, (3) pass the Senate, (4) be signed by the President. None of these have happened.
Until then, the rule for Canadians is unchanged:
No visa required (B-1/B-2 visa-exempt status). Maximum admission length granted by CBP at the POE: up to 6 months (182 days) per entry: the exact length is recorded by CBP on the electronic I-94. No automatic extension: to stay longer, file Form I-539 before I-94 expires. The IRS Substantial Presence Test (SPT) is separate: the immigration limit does not change the tax threshold.
Hypothetical tax impact if the law passes
If H.R. 3070 were enacted as filed, a 240-day U.S. stay would have tax consequences independent of immigration permission:
SPT triggered for sure. The IRS formula (current-year days + 1/3 prior-year + 1/6 two-years-ago ≥ 183) would be exceeded every year at 240 days. The snowbird would be a U.S. tax resident by default and would have to:
- Either file Form 8840 (Closer Connection) to remain non-resident: only possible up to 182 days, not beyond. Or file the Treaty Tie-Breaker via Form 8833 + Form 1040-NR (Article IV Canada-U.S. treaty) to remain non-resident.
- CRA would continue to tax the snowbird as a Canadian resident (U.S. law does not change Canadian residency).
Bottom line: the law would change the immigration permission but not the cross-border tax risk. Snowbirds would still need a Canada-U.S. tax specialist.
Limits and practical risks (if enacted)
Healthcare coverage: the bill excludes Medicare/Medicaid. Snowbirds would still need provincial coverage (RAMQ/OHIP, etc.) plus private travel insurance. Beyond ~210 days outside Canada, provincial coverage may be suspended depending on the province. OAS / GIS: 240 days outside Canada may affect Guaranteed Income Supplement eligibility: confirm with Service Canada. Canadian residence: the bill requires keeping the principal residence in Canada, so snowbirds who sold their Canadian home would lose eligibility. No U.S. employment: excludes paid telework for any employer (even Canadian) from U.S. soil under a cautious reading: caselaw is not yet developed.
Existing alternatives to stay longer
Without H.R. 3070 or an equivalent, Canadians wanting to stay beyond 6 months can consider:
Form I-539 (B-2 extension): up to 6 additional months, with justification (e.g., medical care). Approvals rare for simple comfort. E-2 (Treaty Investor) visa: invest USD $100K+ in an active U.S. business. Renewable indefinitely. O-1 visa: extraordinary ability in arts, sciences, sports, business. EB-5 green card: invest USD $800K (TEA) or $1.05M (non-TEA). Marriage / engagement with a U.S. citizen: K-1 or CR-1/IR-1. Exit and re-enter: common "border-runs," but CBP scrutinizes back-to-back entries and can refuse if the pattern looks like de-facto residence.
How to track the bill
Official ways to follow progress:
Congress.gov: official H.R. 3070 page (status, votes, amendments). Canadian Snowbird Association (snowbirds.org): regular releases from the lobbying group. CBP Travel: any actual change to admission rules will appear here.
If the law is enacted, CanadaFlorida will update this article and publish a new guide on the application modalities.
Official forms (always use the latest edition)
Reader responsibility
Always download the latest edition of the form from the official site cited below. An expired edition can be rejected by USCIS, DOS or IRS. CanadaFlorida is not a substitute for a licensed attorney.
Congress.gov: H.R. 3070, 119th Congress (Canadian Snowbird Act, 2025). Canadian Snowbird Association: bill page. Form I-539: Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status. CBP: Apply for I-94 admission. IRS Form 8840: Closer Connection Exception.
The Senate companion: S. 2406, Canadian Snowbirds Act of 2025
Verified fact: the Senate carries a companion bill, S. 2406, the Canadian Snowbirds Act of 2025, introduced July 23, 2025 by Senator Scott of Florida with Senators Kelly and Gallego; its status on Congress.gov as of June 11, 2026: read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance on July 23, 2025, with no further action recorded. Like its House twin, it is pending and unmoved. A companion bill improves the odds arithmetic only when one chamber actually votes; neither has. Source: congress.gov bill page S. 2406 (119th), consulted June 11, 2026.
Who decides what, if it ever passes
| Aspect | Federal US | Federal CA |
|---|---|---|
| The 240-day admission itself | Congress amends the INA; CBP would administer the new category at the border | No role: U.S. admission is U.S. law |
| Taxes during longer stays | The Substantial Presence Test is UNCHANGED by the bill: more days means more SPT exposure, 8840 or treaty relief required | CRA residency rules unchanged; provincial health-plan day counts unchanged and stricter than the bill |
| Health coverage | Not addressed by the bill | Provincial plans keep their own presence rules (153 to 212 days by province): the binding constraint for most snowbirds even if 240 days became law |
A worked example: what 240 days would and would not change, 2026-27
Suppose the Act passed tomorrow and Pierre, 67, of Brossard, stretched his Florida season to 230 days. Immigration: legal under the new category. Taxes: 230 days makes him a U.S. tax resident under the SPT (any 3-year average over the thresholds), so the Form 8840 closer-connection route is no longer available at that level and treaty tie-breaker filing becomes his annual reality, with professional fees attached. Health: RAMQ requires at least 183 days in Quebec per calendar year, so a 230-day absence forfeits his provincial coverage, and 12 months of private insurance priced for a 67-year-old replaces it. Typical range: that combination commonly costs thousands of dollars per year in advisory and premium costs, June 2026 observation. The bill would change one ceiling out of three; the other two clocks belong to the IRS and to provincial law, and they are the reason the smart season has never been the longest legal one.
Opinion: plan your seasons on the law as it stands (182 days, B-2, the day-count file), and treat this bill the way Congress.gov does: a referred bill with no movement. If it ever clears committee, this page will say so before your travel agent does.
Common mistakes
Planning a season on a pending bill. Nothing is law until both chambers pass it and the President signs; the rule today is the B-2 framework. Confusing the immigration ceiling with the tax and health clocks. The SPT and provincial presence rules do not move with the INA; 240 legal days would still be 240 counted days. Reading reintroduction as momentum. Versions have been introduced repeatedly since 2016 and none has cleared committee; reintroduction is a calendar event, not progress. Citing the wrong name or number. The 119th Congress text is the Canadian Snowbird Act, H.R. 3070; older coverage mixes names and numbers from earlier sessions.
How to follow the bill properly
Track H.R. 3070 (119th) on congress.gov: the Actions tab is the only status that counts. Ignore secondhand headlines; check the latest-action date before repeating anything. If an action appears (hearing, markup, floor vote), reread this page: we re-verify at each review. Keep your planning on the current 182-day framework and its day-count discipline meanwhile.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Canadian Snowbird Act law?
No, in either chamber. As of June 11, 2026, H.R. 3070 sits where it was referred on April 29, 2025 (House Judiciary and Ways and Means), and the Senate companion S. 2406 sits where it was referred on July 23, 2025 (Finance). No vote, no hearing, no floor action on either, per Congress.gov.
What would it actually allow?
Canadians 50 and older meeting the conditions (Canadian residence maintained, no U.S. employment) could stay up to 240 days in a 365-day period, against about 182 under today's B-2 practice.
Would 240 days be tax-free time?
No: the Substantial Presence Test is untouched by the bill. Longer stays mean U.S. tax residency questions and treaty filings; the tax chapter of this site is unchanged by anything in H.R. 3070.
Would my provincial health plan follow?
No: provincial presence rules (183 days in Quebec and Ontario terms, 212 in Alberta's allowance) are provincial law. For most snowbirds these clocks, not immigration, bind first.
What are its odds?
GovTrack's published prognosis on June 10, 2026 is 2 percent, consistent with every prior version since 2016 dying in committee. Pending, but not moving.
Every figure, rate, threshold, and deadline in this guide is drawn from a verifiable primary source listed at the bottom of the page. The article is updated whenever the underlying rules change, with a fresh review date stamped at the top.
Sources and references
Public sources verified as of the last review date.
Disclaimer
This guide is for educational purpose only. Figures, rates, thresholds, timelines and rules are drawn from public sources at the date shown and may change.
For any concrete decision, consult a licensed US immigration attorney and a cross-border tax attorney.